DemocracyInnovatorsLoading…
Archive · 68 conversations
Interviews and field notes from people building new forms of democratic practice.
Marcello Coppa discusses the Feel Community, the Govtech Forum, and how to accelerate public innovation. The conversation explores civic technology, public-sector reform, policy entrepreneurship, and the conditions that help new democratic and governmental tools move from isolated experiments into broader institutional practice.
Stefaan Verhulst discusses how governance improves when institutions learn to ask better questions, use evidence responsibly, and design decision-making around real public problems. The conversation connects democratic innovation with data, collective intelligence, institutional capacity, and the practical challenge of turning broad civic participation into decisions that governments can understand and act on.
Yuting Jiang explains the Agora Citizen Network and the use of Polis-style, bridging-based algorithms to surface areas of agreement across divided groups. The conversation explores how online participation can avoid simple majority logic, identify constructive consensus, and support democratic processes where citizens contribute ideas without being reduced to partisan camps.
Hélène Landemore discusses deliberative democracy, citizens’ assemblies, and the institutional future of democracy. The conversation examines why representative systems need deeper citizen participation, how randomly selected deliberative bodies can complement elections, and what it would mean to make public reasoning a more regular part of democratic decision-making.
Nathan Schneider explores protocols, modular politics, and governance in online communities. The conversation connects digital constitutionalism, platform design, and democratic experimentation, asking how communities can create rules, adapt institutions, and build more accountable online spaces without relying only on centralized platforms or informal moderation habits.
Massimo Bugani reflects on the Rousseau platform as a democratic experiment and on what digital participation taught Italian political organizing. The conversation covers online voting, member engagement, institutional resistance, the limits of platform-based democracy, and the lessons that remain useful for future civic technologies and political innovation.
Matt Stempeck discusses the Civic Tech Field Guide and what can be learned from the success and failure of civic technology projects. The conversation looks at field mapping, reuse, funding, community needs, institutional adoption, and why democratic technology works best when it is connected to real practice rather than isolated prototypes.
Samuel Vance-Law discusses how digital transformation can create room for governance innovation inside public institutions. The conversation explores modernization, public-sector capacity, civic engagement, and the ways technology projects can open deeper questions about how governments listen, coordinate, and redesign services around democratic values.
This cross-podcast dialogue brings Democracy Innovators into conversation with broader debates on governance, democracy, and institutional innovation. The exchange reflects on democratic renewal, experimentation, civic technology, and the practical difficulty of changing institutions while keeping participation meaningful, legitimate, and connected to public decision-making.
Simone Maria Parazzoli discusses the Agentic State and the possibility that algorithms could transform how governments operate. The conversation examines AI agents, administrative capacity, public services, democratic oversight, and the tension between more responsive state systems and the need to keep political authority accountable to citizens.
Marco Cappato and Francesco Vecchi discuss how AI could empower democracy when it is designed around civic agency rather than manipulation. The conversation explores participation, deliberation, political rights, digital tools, and the safeguards needed if artificial intelligence is to strengthen democratic decision-making instead of concentrating power.
Vir Sanghavi explains Tilt.vote and its approach to improving democratic debate. The conversation focuses on how structured argument, better incentives, and digital design can help people compare positions, reduce polarization, and make public disagreement more useful for collective decisions instead of turning debate into performative conflict.